??? 05/04/06 11:57 Read: times |
#115554 - it almost is Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Just checked. They deliver several header files for each mcu, one for every compiler (IAR, Raisonance, Tasking too) not one generic.
Those header files use a macro to declare sfr's but they did not implement the macro for SDCC correctly. It should be something like: #if defined SDCC #define Sfr(x, y) __sfr __at (y) x #define Sbit(x, y, z) __sbit __at (y+z) x #define Sfr16(x,y) __sfr16 __at (((y+1)<<8) | y) x #endif |
Topic | Author | Date |
SDCC and Keil C compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
major differences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ansi incompatabilities | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC vs keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
other way round :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC vs Keil Part 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
actualy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sfr declarations NOT compatible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
too bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps it is? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it almost is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the root of many evils | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another important difference! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fast & efficient code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem with porting code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bla bla | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
semicolon missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
set TI=1 in your init_uart() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Have you looked at this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
General Tip: Disable all extensions![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |