| ??? 05/04/06 21:57 Read: times |
#115613 - fast & efficient code Responding to: ???'s previous message |
One is free, the other isn't.
I did try SDCC for a while, run OK, except it's too slow to produce the objects (test it on my old window98-300MHz). Another thing I notice, the compiler does'nt generate efficient code & fast as the others. For hobbies, its OK. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC and Keil C compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| major differences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ansi incompatabilities | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC vs keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other way round :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC vs Keil Part 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| actualy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sfr declarations NOT compatible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| too bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perhaps it is? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it almost is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the root of many evils | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another important difference! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fast & efficient code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem with porting code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bla bla | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| semicolon missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| set TI=1 in your init_uart() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you looked at this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
General Tip: Disable all extensions | 01/01/70 00:00 |