??? 06/21/06 18:17 Read: times |
#118785 - USB to parallel cable Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Guldmann said:
Hello Forum!
I working on a new projekt, and choose to use Atmels 89S52 - it fits in, and its cheap! I got ISP too, so I orderd the cable from Atmel...UPS there isnt a parallel port on my notebook PC. Shall i try to get a USB to paralellel adapter or is smarter to use some sort of programmer that accept USB (preferred) or RS 232. Basicly, I want proven solutions - not kitchen table devices. Any comments apreciated Per While I haven't run into this situation myself, I tend to agree with the responses these two members have already left: J. Guy said:
The USB to parallel will not emulate the parallel port hardware (and give you 0x378 or 0x278 ports). This greatly decreases the chances that the ISP software will work. Unless
the ISP software specifically states that it will work with USB-parallel, you are wasting your time. Jan Waclawek said:
The ready-made USB-to-parallel thingy performs only one thing - they print. No support for explicit bitbanging. Sorry. No support for el cheapo homebrew stuff on "legacy-free" PC.
JW And, if the USB <==> serial adapters I've played with are any indication of what you can expect with these, you might be in for some unpleasant surprises about the stability of the device driver that comes with it. So, don't try to hack together what could be readily accomplished with a single commercial off-the-shelf product: just get yourself a USB device programmer. As an alternative though, your laptop might very well contain traditional hardware parallel port functionality, minus the physical connector. If that is the case, the connector would probably be available on a port replicator/docking station offered by the laptop's manufacturer. Such port replicators/docking stations typically attach to the laptop via a proprietary connector that provides access to internal busses on the laptop's system board. I saw a product in a catalog some weeks ago made by a third party manufacturer called a "port replicator" for use with any laptop. That strikes me as a remarkable misnomer. Since it was really nothing more than a USB-attached collection of I/O devices, there's no reason to believe it would work any better than the USB <==> parallel cable you described. --Sasha Jevtic |
Topic | Author | Date |
no parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, you shouldn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, it won't work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB to parallel cable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
latest driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You could try this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I won't say it cannot be done... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LPT in PCMCIA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Buy an old notebook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no parallel port - update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Elnec programmers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ELNEC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elnec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Old laptop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pcmcia | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB to 89S52. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its good if it works under all conditions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it anything like the link, stay away![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |