| ??? 06/27/06 12:59 Read: times |
#119190 - Yes, good idea Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Alistair said:
Sorry but isn't it standard practice to put a low value cap say around .001 ufd across a switch to help debounce then handle the rest in software. Yes, analog guys do this. Insert an additional small series resistor between cap and switch to form a RC low pass filter to improve the situation by adding a current limit to keep the working life of switch contact high and by adding some noise suppression. Series resistor must be chosen small enough, though, to allow the input to fall to 0V, of course. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multiple switch debouncing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Otherways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| vertical conters in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| vertical counter with press detection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| debounce and denoise needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are right of course, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reminds me... (off topic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XRL P2,A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| some hair-splitting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exchange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanx Kai ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exactly! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spot on. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two samples enough? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| varies with design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conditional executing versus branching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KEY RELEASE SUBROUTINE ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not really... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a TOTAL misconception or -very annoying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| He does not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Beer o'clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| never did, never will | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Agree | 01/01/70 00:00 |