??? 06/30/06 17:25 Read: times |
#119463 - You 'can' make the chips you use work fo Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm sorry but i don't think you got my question right, it's in the main thread. I'm supposed to be storing data into the 24c04 continuously
Again: Thse chips are made so that you can replace 2 -02 with one -04 etc. Now, if that is what you want, there are plenty of other chips that will work for you, just not these old standards. I am particullar to Ramtron http://www.ramtron.com/lib/liter...s_r3.0.pdf for no reason other than the Unlimited Read/Write Cycles. You 'can' make the chips you use work for you, but it will take quite some coding of the driver to detect that eg 17 bytes at 0xff will take wiite 16, set address, write 1. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
eeprom word addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do not confuse bits and bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maximum seerial memory chip available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, you do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
code not working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to post code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
formatted code. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I searched for a comment stating "write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"write device address"-i2c subroutine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you reply with an uncommented sub | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
formatted code with comments. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ORL a,HighAddressBit; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You 'can' make the chips you use work fo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Question still remains unanswred | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i told you how | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One more time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
code written for that but not working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
rather than trying to figure your code o | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrections please, urgent. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is in the data sheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
datasheet![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |