| ??? 07/24/06 14:17 Read: times |
#120945 - reply to Christoph Franck Responding to: ???'s previous message |
TL0=0x77;TH0=0xEC;//5000micro sec Shouldn't this be done in an actual initialization routine ? Ans: 'TL0=0x77;TH0=0xEC;//5000micro sec' statement is present in te beginning of main where other initializations are also done.And subsequently timer0 is initialized in the infinite loop of main inside code that will be executed after timer 0 interrupt occurs. what other interrupt routines are present, and at which priorities ? Ans: only 3 interrupts of 3 timer overflows are present. timer 0 interrupt has higher priority than timer1 interrupt.I dont know about priority of timer2.What is it? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| problem in timer with a least count of 1 millisec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code as shown should work methinks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clarifications | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| atomicity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| atomicity problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about atomicity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Back to basic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply to vishal sinha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hm ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply to Christoph Franck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| totally imprecse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the size of the variables? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not enough info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other details about code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here you go again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yet questions more | 01/01/70 00:00 |