| ??? 07/24/06 14:30 Read: times |
#120947 - reply to vishal sinha Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Vishal Sinha said:
If you have an interrupt occuring very frequently, the time eaten up by these 'hidden' steps become significant. Thank you sir for your reply. It is a requirement in this application to execute interrupt frequently(as time has to be incremented every millisec).And as stated by you 'hiden' steps are taking far too long.Then, wat is te way out to make microcontroller run faster? Sir could interchanging the codes executed inside timer 0 and timer2 interrupts help?what is the priority of timer 2 interrupt in comparison to timer 0 and 1? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| problem in timer with a least count of 1 millisec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code as shown should work methinks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clarifications | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| atomicity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| atomicity problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about atomicity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Back to basic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply to vishal sinha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hm ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply to Christoph Franck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| totally imprecse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the size of the variables? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not enough info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other details about code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here you go again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yet questions more | 01/01/70 00:00 |