| ??? 06/04/01 09:42 Read: times |
#12172 - RE: Keil C : read two byte? |
It's a lot of hard work for something which is easily achieved by use of a standard 'C' construct - the union.
Don't make difficulties for yourself! As he's said, it doesn't even work on all versions of the compiler! As for the inefficiency of the shift method, what optimisation level are you using? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Keil C : read two byte? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



