Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/04/01 16:39
Read: times


 
#12182 - RE: Keil C : read two byte?
Indeed!
Very often, the price you pay for greater efficiency is reduced portability.
I was just pointing out the pros & cons of the 2 approaches.

Even the union need not be a show-stopper for portability; if you write carefully, and isolate all your compiler/target dependencies into one place, it's not so bad to have compiler/target-specific versions of that file.
You can use #if to select the appropriate version, and then the rest of the code just keeps using the same names!

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil C : read two byte?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List