Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 08/15/06 12:14 Read: times	#122266 - it does Responding to: ???'s previous message
	As far as I can tell, ?C?CCASE uses a fair number of MOVC instructions.

List of 38 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
Switch/Case and code protection		01/01/70 00:00
What does it do?		01/01/70 00:00
I activate MOVC Disable.		01/01/70 00:00
In that case ...		01/01/70 00:00
Can't tell...uses external CCASE routine		01/01/70 00:00
Things you can and can't do ...		01/01/70 00:00
it does		01/01/70 00:00
(double post, please disregard)		01/01/70 00:00
switch can use MOVC instructions		01/01/70 00:00
Aha!		01/01/70 00:00
protecting LPC chips		01/01/70 00:00
protecting LPC chips		01/01/70 00:00
Old question		01/01/70 00:00
case		01/01/70 00:00
Errr...		01/01/70 00:00
There is more than just switch/case		01/01/70 00:00
No C without MOVC		01/01/70 00:00
Protection on other derivatives		01/01/70 00:00
Example - AT89C51		01/01/70 00:00
AT89C51 can do MOVC internal !		01/01/70 00:00
nope		01/01/70 00:00
LPC Protection		01/01/70 00:00
naah, but make it quite a bit more difficult		01/01/70 00:00
Compiler Optimisation		01/01/70 00:00
sure, but there will still be MOVC		01/01/70 00:00
And upgrading the compiler can change the output		01/01/70 00:00
the ICEman cometh		01/01/70 00:00
I have found no issues with the ICE		01/01/70 00:00
sure it 'works'		01/01/70 00:00
The Reason		01/01/70 00:00
no, no, no		01/01/70 00:00
But you said..		01/01/70 00:00
if you heard what I thought I said		01/01/70 00:00
Confused		01/01/70 00:00
jmp @dptr is not movc		01/01/70 00:00
jmp @dptr is a computed goto not a jump table		01/01/70 00:00
what requires a movc???		01/01/70 00:00
Jump TABLE		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List