??? 08/28/06 03:20 Read: times |
#123169 - Another A51 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Charles Bannister said:
I assembled the test program without the comma in the EQU line and with the comma in the EQU line. Below are the results. A51 expects the comma.
PseudoSam(tm) 51 assembler. V1.6.00 Oops! My bad. I was thinking of the A51 written by William Colley. Thanks for setting that straight. |
Topic | Author | Date |
equ statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EQU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A51 Equates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a51 and d51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
update?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Syntax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what a51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Most are NOT Keil! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and still named a51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A51 expect comma in equ statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PseudoSam(tm) 51 assembler. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But he's using TASM51 - not A51! | 01/01/70 00:00 |