| ??? 08/28/06 23:36 Read: times |
#123240 - PseudoSam(tm) 51 assembler. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Charles Bannister said:
I assembled the test program without the comma in the EQU line and with the comma in the EQU line. Below are the results. A51 expects the comma. I think we've already established that "A51" is not sufficient to identify a specific product? PseudoSam(tm) 51 assembler. V1.6.00 Level I Semi-professional Development Product Copyright (c) 1986,87,88 PseudoCorp Charles posted the manual for this particular "A51" here: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=110458 PseudoSam Assembler Manual Level I said:
.equ <identifier> ',' <integer expression>
;gives identifier the value of the
;integer expression.
;<identifier> can NOT be redefined!
;also forward references are allowed
;as long as they are resolved by the
;second pass. So there you are - the PseudoSam Assembler Manual clearly states that the comma is required if you're using the PseudoSam Assembler. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| equ statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EQU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A51 Equates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a51 and d51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
update? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Syntax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what a51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most are NOT Keil! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and still named a51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A51 expect comma in equ statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PseudoSam(tm) 51 assembler. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But he's using TASM51 - not A51! | 01/01/70 00:00 |