| ??? 06/18/01 10:08 Read: times |
#12591 - RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction |
The subject of run-time non-valid instructions might appear to be of no practical interest, but maybe this question lead us to a very interesting aspect: how is the instruction decoder implemented in a particular 8051 family member?. Why might one valid instruction (that is, one that agrees with syntax and uses a valid address mode) fail in execution-time?.
I don“t know if the following question has been already considered in this forum (I am here since a couple of monthes only): I wonder why there is no 'dec dptr' instruction, but one reserved machine code does exist. Maybe the first implementation included a dec dptr that failed to work (using that reserved code?). Alfredo. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MOV A, ACC illegal instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: reserved instruction 0xA5 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about "push" instruction as well ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: How about "push" instruction as well | 01/01/70 00:00 |



