??? 11/15/06 22:14 Modified: 11/15/06 22:16 Read: times |
#128051 - Okay, I feel better Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks Erik,
I feel better now. I didn't think the control passed to 0x000b until T0 overflowed. And yes, I too believe that the OP is asking for a second T0 interrupt, not just on overflow but on every increment of T0. I would then recommend he use Russ' solution. Even if he has plenty of time to poll the input (as your questions in another post seem to be suggesting), there's really no apparent need (untill and unless he pulls more constraints out of his hat) if he just uses the hardware already at his disposal. Joe |
Topic | Author | Date |
Timer0 Interupt question.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use INT0 or INT1 ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or still T0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in some places 0x0b is called the vector for the t | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Overflow only? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, just on overflow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reading between the lines ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Okay, I feel better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if the OP had clarified and one case had been![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cutting through | 01/01/70 00:00 |