| ??? 12/07/06 16:30 Read: times |
#129147 - OK Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik I think you meant
P2 = I2CON; while(1); *************DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS************************ PS The bondouts are "ICE specific" you can replace a "bondout for ICE x" with a "bondout for ICE x" but not with a "bondout for ICE y" I am using KEIL EPM900. I will try your recommendation Thanks J.C. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P89LPC936 I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use CodwArchitect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, I do not do 'time' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik I need help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about AA? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the p89v66x datasheet and go through | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What about this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the address issue ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't shift | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In other words if a slave uC (or some other | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SI != 0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not handle bits, I write the SFR in one go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry, SILABS SFR doing exactly the same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I tried | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you using a bondout? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try it the old fashioned way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is this easier to understand? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It Cleared | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| send an e-mail | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| License Expired | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
let your friendly local NXP contact know | 01/01/70 00:00 |