??? 12/07/06 17:08 Read: times |
#129151 - OK Responding to: ???'s previous message |
OK Erik I understand it now. I will try it and let you know. By the way I changed the bondout chip to a LPC932 and the result was the same. I'll let you when I try plan A.
Thanks |
Topic | Author | Date |
P89LPC936 I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use CodwArchitect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I did | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, I do not do 'time' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik I need help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what about AA? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Here! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
read the p89v66x datasheet and go through | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What about this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the address issue ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Don't shift | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In other words if a slave uC (or some other | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SI != 0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not handle bits, I write the SFR in one go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What is that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry, SILABS SFR doing exactly the same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I tried | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are you using a bondout? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
try it the old fashioned way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is this easier to understand? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It Cleared | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
send an e-mail | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
License Expired | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
let your friendly local NXP contact know![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |