| ??? 02/27/07 21:08 Read: times Msg Score: 0 -1 Offensive/Flame +1 Underrated |
#133886 - wht a bunch of gobbelygook! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Adding more to this, even if you use most of your ram, your program will behave abnormal from the required behavior.
since when is that so? I have never experienced that Reason: Overwriting of certain variables! if you do not know how to code, absolutely, if you do know how to code this does not happen. Some just love to fool around with absolute addresses of variables and, typically screw it up. Leaving it to the linker saves that agony. So its not only important to keep the space for stack but it is also necessary to keep room for variables, some gap is required. for whatis "some gap required"? Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| using 256 bytes of ram 0f 8052 in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you can't, the most you can get is 248 (256 - one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil internal ram | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| resons for extending memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is, and thus it takes many reads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lookup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is limit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try it if you think its wrong :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wht a bunch of gobbelygook! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Qualifers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sloppy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problem solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You Must Read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTFMs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The solution could be as simple as: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just note about size | 01/01/70 00:00 |