Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/07/07 15:41
Modified:
  03/07/07 15:50
Read: times


 		 #134503 - Oops its Erik not Eric (Proc: For Multiple Data)
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Well sir as you told it would be work on single data...

and for multiple data there is program pleas look at this

Save This Code

SERIAL:		PUSH ACC		;Push A
		JNB RB8,GET_DATA	;Jump if RB8=0 means data
		MOV A,SBUF		;Move the copy to Accumulator
		CJNE B,#001H,GO_ON	;Compare the Address if its equal to 001H then
		CLR SM2			;Clear the SM2 to get the data
		RETI			;Return back from ISR
GET_DATA:	MOV A,SBUF		;Get the copy to Accumulator
		MOV B,A			;Save the A to B to main to see
		CJNE A,#010H,ANOTHER
END_DATA:	SETB SM2		;Set the SM2 for agian for the Address
ANOTER:		POP ACC			;Pop A
GO_ON:		RETI			;Return back


List of 59 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
is AT89C51 can support Auto Address Rec: feature ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   IF they aren't there, it doesn't do it!            01/01/70 00:00      
      why the automatic address recognition?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Every little helps!            01/01/70 00:00      
            let's calculate a bit            01/01/70 00:00      
               an often forgotten fact            01/01/70 00:00      
                  certainly            01/01/70 00:00      
                     let me try            01/01/70 00:00      
                        this sounds like....            01/01/70 00:00      
                           As I said, it is not easy to find an example thst            01/01/70 00:00      
                              if it\'s not easy to find an example...            01/01/70 00:00      
      WHO told you that you HAVE to use a derivative t            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well ofcourse i am not going to design 100000            01/01/70 00:00      
            I will help you, but not write your code            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well thanks Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
               well sir if i write a code then could you check it            01/01/70 00:00      
                  sure            01/01/70 00:00      
                     well sir its this ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        you can't do this            01/01/70 00:00      
                           well instead of Rx            01/01/70 00:00      
                        On Comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                           So Sorry for my Mistake            01/01/70 00:00      
                              stop accusing yourself            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Well sir its Honor for me :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The Right one here goes            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I think you made the wrong change            01/01/70 00:00      
                              this will (almost) work if you only have one data            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Well sir Eric i think you are Talking about it....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    not yet            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Ooooh, another '51 pitfall...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Hows That ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          still not good...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I just noticed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       as I said            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Ah i am not in Hurry....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             still not good II.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I have did it... you can see it i have Edited it .            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             ok, look at line 4            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Simple,like if Address not match then GO_ON            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   WHAT is in 'b'?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      I have finally got it.....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         now add the PUSH/POP PSW...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Well i think that Pushing PSW is not neccesary ..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               better this than be sorry....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  Sir you are right that carry is effected...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     avoid common pitfalls            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     famous last words            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        Well sir i will never forget the carry is changed.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           RTFM            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        Well sir How to save the Carry ??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           see http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=134583            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              Well sir i will see this later...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 so, that is the reason for the hurry            01/01/70 00:00      
         No compulsion!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Oops its Erik not Eric (Proc: For Multiple Data)            01/01/70 00:00      
      stop hurrying            01/01/70 00:00      
   It just hit me - you can't            01/01/70 00:00      
   Well sir i have give up ... means no computer...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List