| ??? 03/13/07 07:54 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#134834 - Nitin needs to more thoroughly consider Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
They're not small, and they're not cheap, but they're capable of basic ethernet or T1. Yep; it's the classic trade-off: Zigbee is designed to be small, cheap, and very low power for low-data-volume applications - if you want high speed and/or high volume, you need to think of something else. Clearly, Nitin needs to more thoroughly consider his Requirements - "transmit digital data from a mUC on RF over a distance of say 50m" is just too vague! (and the source of the data is largely irrelevant). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| mUc Data over RF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| zigbee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i've tryed, very nice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Great help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Data rates & volumes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are boxes that will handle 10 Mbps ethernet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nitin needs to more thoroughly consider | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Xbee datarate is up to 115kb as i remember | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Data Rate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tried WHAT? | 01/01/70 00:00 |