| ??? 04/26/07 13:39 Read: times |
#138013 - Atmel vs. Atmel vs. Atmel Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez Smith said:
http://atmel.com/dyn/produ...ily_id=607
have been around for a long time,its almost as if the atmel 8051 variants and the atmega where made by different companies. Jez, 1. There are at least two 8051 groups within Atmel - the original one and the ex-Temic one. It seems they don't cooperate nor coordinate their documentation. And the best joke is, that (some of) the support for 8051s is provided by the Norway team - the makers of AVRs - which clearly doesn't cooperate with the '51 teams. 2. This appnote is related to the ex-Temic 'RD2's. This bootloader - as the whole chip - is heavily inspired by the Philip's 'RD2 (plus its past and future incarnations). The main difference to the AVRs is, that the 'RD2s have the bootloader factory-programmed (and ROM-ish), and it presents the main (only) method of ISP for these chips. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| '51 bootloader basics appnote by Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| advantage of UART bootloaders | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and yet these bootloaders | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Atmel vs. Atmel vs. Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well the NXP ISP 'appnote' is found at | 01/01/70 00:00 |