??? 05/02/07 12:06 Read: times |
#138459 - All this can be ignored, if you use chips with har Responding to: ???'s previous message |
For bit-bash I2C - I suggest to riggorously test i2c functions.
Sometimes.... I2c transmission gets stuck waiting in a loop for an ACK... so you may need to handle a time out situation where ... after X mS of time. Re-Initialise the I2c bus or take other action. All this can be ignored, if you use chips with hardware IIC. such are available for less than $1 (in volume) and about $3 for singles. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
i2c - hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More information needed Eg Distance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: more information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'd add none | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dosn't work on 29 February, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one day off | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I2c Pullup\'s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
All this can be ignored, if you use chips with har | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, I2c hardware on board is desired | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
language? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
on-board ..I mean on-chip![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |