| ??? 05/29/07 16:56 Read: times |
#139984 - I dug through some old emails Responding to: ???'s previous message |
8/18/2005 Craig Steiner wrote: > Jon, just so you know... I spent most of the day today investigating this relocatable segment problem. At this point I'm not convinced that multiple modules with the same segment ever worked. This is surprising to me because I'm sure I tested it but looking at the code I can't imagine how it could have worked. I worked with Craig for a few monthes Beta testing the 16-bit version of Pinnacle. I know he's started a complete re-write for the win32 platform, but I'm not sure where he's at on that. I also know he has been very busy with alot of other things. When it's ready, I'll be willing to beta test that too. Jon |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Pinnacle 52 project / module problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Known problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look here for support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Craig Steiners input? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What was the conclusion Jon? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I dug through some old emails | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for the info Jon | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Metalink | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Metalink does not support modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Original Intel Assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relocatable modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Found it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Craig? | 01/01/70 00:00 |