| ??? 06/25/07 08:29 Read: times |
#141216 - I stand corrected Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes, I tend only to think of GPRS in the context most of us see it used (i.e. via our mobile phones via the usual service providers) which is of course wrong, but it works for me ;-).
The advantage of the solution I have suggested is that it can work with 'normal web-access type GPRS services' (for want of a better expression) so that you have a wider choice of tariffs and network coverage than you may otherwise have with a specialized M2M service. Then again, there's nothing to say an M2M-specific service may not suffice for your application Vinay. Matt. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| GPRS and 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not 8051 specific! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| GPRS and 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's just IP Networking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intranetworking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| local subnet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Embeddedc Server | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong sort of server! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More Tutorials - Sockets, HTTP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| APN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Embedded Server | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its all in the tunneling. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Embedded Server | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| GPRS in general; embedded devices in particular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I stand corrected | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| M2M | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where is the machine located? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
M2M | 01/01/70 00:00 |