| ??? 10/22/07 08:23 Read: times |
#145989 - Problem solved! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
To Andy: You're right, it wasn't the linker. In fact it was the compiler. I don't know how the optimization works, but now I don't use it anymore.
Problem's been solved! I put the compiler's optimization to none, and it works just fine. I don't know why the put such a stupid optimization algorithm that removed part of the code while compiling it. But one thing that I don't understand, it seemed to me that everything is translated correctly from C to ASM. So, when and where exactly it does the optimization? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| CC2430 Timer1 strange behaviour | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to use the 'Insert Code' button | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, I post another in pre-formated one ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Brushless1 & 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IAR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| limit values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| limit values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why do you suspect the Linker?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem solved! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That indicates a flaw in your code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Understaning C Compiler Optimisations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buggy compilers. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you fully understand the issues | 01/01/70 00:00 |