| ??? 08/31/01 16:14 Read: times |
#14654 - RE: error correcting codes |
Hi Steve,
The Reed-Solomon and Viterby encoding is very different, because first one is modular code and second one is sequenced code. >Can an 8052 decode the message in real >time ? Well, it depends on what is polinomial size, code interval and so on. About 15 years ago I write the program for processing Viterby codes. The code distance was 3. The program could correct any 2 bits among 10 bits in the sequence stream 1200 baud in real time. I think the modern '52 can process 9600 bps stream. By the way, what is the signal-to-noise ratio on your channel? There is tonnes of codes to implement. For example, PNR code, (16,8) code, Goley ...Hemming code at last. All is up to you:-) Cheers, George |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| error correcting codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: error correcting codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: error correcting codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: error correcting codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: error correcting codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik's suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik's suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: George's comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: error correcting codes (Erik's sugge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: error correcting codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: RF communications | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: RF communications | 01/01/70 00:00 |



