| ??? 12/07/07 05:32 Read: times |
#147962 - consider how it works Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Richard Erlacher said:
The notion of "getting by" is based on the assumption that you use only 9 bits per character Doesn't it also assume that characters are not sent back-to-back...? Characters sent "back to back" or in isochronous mode, still are received in accordance with standard asynchronous technique, which means nothing happens once the stop bit is generated, and things remain so until the start bit (opposite in sense to the stop bit) is detected. Then, the sampling begins one-half bit-time later and continues sampling in phase with that event at the bit rate for those 9 bits. If there's error (bit-frame slip) within the stop bit, it matters not, nor does it really quite get to the threshold, since it's got a half-bit of slack anyway. The sampling typically is timed from a timebase of 16x the sample rate, which means that the beginning of the start bit is always detected at the next (16x) clock. That has to be taken into consideration if one is operating very close to the margin. Both ends do have to be working with the same data format, of course. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Unusual Baud Rate! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing special | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the same as for the so-called "standard" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How do you mean both? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not at the same time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OBD requirement, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SO why the secrecy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why didn't you just mention it in the first place | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more explanation, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Autobaud? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you'd just need one UART switchable between... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simultaneous solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ±3% of the desired rate, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe you can get by ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2nd assumption? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consider how it works | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 11.5198 MHz! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try This For Near Exact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
even better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two Baud to Uarts :) | 01/01/70 00:00 |



