Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/07/07 05:32
Read: times


 
#147962 - consider how it works
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
Richard Erlacher said:
The notion of "getting by" is based on the assumption that you use only 9 bits per character


Doesn't it also assume that characters are not sent back-to-back...?





Characters sent "back to back" or in isochronous mode, still are received in accordance with standard asynchronous technique, which means nothing happens once the stop bit is generated, and things remain so until the start bit (opposite in sense to the stop bit) is detected. Then, the sampling begins one-half bit-time later and continues sampling in phase with that event at the bit rate for those 9 bits. If there's error (bit-frame slip) within the stop bit, it matters not, nor does it really quite get to the threshold, since it's got a half-bit of slack anyway. The sampling typically is timed from a timebase of 16x the sample rate, which means that the beginning of the start bit is always detected at the next (16x) clock. That has to be taken into consideration if one is operating very close to the margin. Both ends do have to be working with the same data format, of course.

RE




List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Unusual Baud Rate!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Nothing special            01/01/70 00:00      
      the same as for the so-called "standard"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes!            01/01/70 00:00      
   How do you mean both?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not at the same time!            01/01/70 00:00      
         OBD requirement,            01/01/70 00:00      
            SO why the secrecy?            01/01/70 00:00      
               why didn't you just mention it in the first place            01/01/70 00:00      
      more explanation,            01/01/70 00:00      
         Autobaud?            01/01/70 00:00      
         if you'd just need one UART switchable between...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   Simultaneous solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      ±3% of the desired rate,            01/01/70 00:00      
   maybe you can get by ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      2nd assumption?            01/01/70 00:00      
         consider how it works            01/01/70 00:00      
      11.5198 MHz!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Try This For Near Exact            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
            even better            01/01/70 00:00      
   Two Baud to Uarts :)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List