| ??? 09/07/01 20:44 Read: times |
#14814 - RE: Coments field ( ;) |
Yes, they are NECESSARY. I did, in earlier days, some times write a "quickie" without comments and lived to regret it. The comments are made to make YOU remember what YOU did when YOU get back after 2 years to update your code. They are also nice if someone else tries to figure out what you did, but do them for egotistical reasons, that way they get done.
Have fun, but comment ardently Erik PS Kernighan and Ritchie did the world an enormous disfavor when they claimed "C" to be "self documenting" |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;), Kathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) - Kathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Never Comment !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) - Kathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Still Off_Base - Kathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) - Kathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) - Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;),Alfredo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;),Gil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;),Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;),Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Coments field ( ;),Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Coments field ( ;),Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |



