| ??? 12/21/07 14:57 Read: times |
#148589 - always Responding to: ???'s previous message |
do You ever avoid "non-debuggable"?
I always avoid "non-debuggable" my principle is: I do not care if code works, I do care if it is maintainable. Erik |
| ??? 12/21/07 14:57 Read: times |
#148589 - always Responding to: ???'s previous message |
do You ever avoid "non-debuggable"?
I always avoid "non-debuggable" my principle is: I do not care if code works, I do care if it is maintainable. Erik |