Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/09/08 05:40
Read: times


 		 #150513 - Thats your subjective understanding
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
Jecksons Ben said:
Is there code for AT89C2051+HD44XXX to display uart tx/rx?

SO, in other words, data received by the UART is to be displayed on the LCD.

For receiving data at the UART, you would have functions likeuart_receive_byte()
uart_receive_string()
etcClearly, none of those functions would have anything to do with the LCD.


Similarly, for displaying data on the LCD, you would have functions likelcd_display_byte()
lcd_display_string()
etcClearly, none of those functions would have anything to do with the UART.


and way of seeing things.






List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
parallel LCD(HD type) for serial uart LCD display            01/01/70 00:00      
   What's the problem?            01/01/70 00:00      
      entirely irrelevant to this -- why?            01/01/70 00:00      
         They can be treated as 2 separate sub-systems            01/01/70 00:00      
            2 sub systems.. ohhh splitting :) remember!            01/01/70 00:00      
               What are you on about            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I mean electrical interfaces            01/01/70 00:00      
         Look at it this way...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thats your subjective understanding            01/01/70 00:00      
               Ah, you got me there!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  God someone save me - I clearly explain it            01/01/70 00:00      
                     How would it be confusing?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nop you did this to him            01/01/70 00:00      
                           No, that was for you!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              How did you make out that I want you to teach me            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 How could it be unnecessary?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    And you started teaching me instead ? , Iam not OP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       You were the one that couldn't see it            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I can see that , you are reveiling a BIG secret            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             thye irrelavancy is            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Then you didnt ..            01/01/70 00:00      
   Application            01/01/70 00:00      
      Here's nearby pasific            01/01/70 00:00      
         If you had searched the web ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            OK thank's            01/01/70 00:00      
               Just build it            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Different between innovative and homemade            01/01/70 00:00      
                     You still haven't said what the problem is            01/01/70 00:00      
                     very expensive            01/01/70 00:00      
   but the question asked for code - not physical I/F            01/01/70 00:00      
      An ounce of work is better than pound of criticism            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List