| ??? 02/18/08 21:33 Read: times |
#151073 - Why only microcontrollers? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Craig Steiner said:
NO SECURITY CIRCUMVENTION MESSAGES WITHOUT PERMISSION. Do not post messages asking for help in breaking the security of a microcontroller. Why specifically only the security of a microcontroller? One of the recently deleted "security circumvention" threads was about "cracking" the licence security of commercial pc-based tools. Surely such threads should be treated exactly the same? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| MODIFICATION TO FORUM RULES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What about posting recipes for lock bit breaking? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why only microcontrollers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good point - good catch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Circumvention | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not so sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Positive change | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Report to moderator 'Tab' needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seconded! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Coming soon | 01/01/70 00:00 |