??? 03/06/08 15:02 Read: times |
#151954 - to be absolutely honest... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... if this is the Keil's idea of a proper mixed C/asm .lst file, one more reason not to go for it.
But maybe I am too used to the good stuff (SDCC's listfiles in this case) ;-) Well, I indeed do believe disassembly would have a very similar informational value. --- But, as far as the real case is concerned, I see no problem here... Aquib, are you really sure the problem is where you described? How *exactly* did you come to the conclusion that it stops at that particular instruction? JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
Problem with P89V51RD2 to AT93C46A (SERIAL EEPROM) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dummy Bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Dummy Bit & Code Update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
asm? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ASM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
disassemble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: ASM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that is silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that's a +-10 lines C source... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CODE compiler directive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
#code ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry.... here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I believe in doing it right, even when ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
10 lines maximum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Jon Ledbetter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
.lst | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"1" preceeding instructions and "0" for data![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The ASM lst file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jan, would you not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to be absolutely honest... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LEDs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: LEDs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this might be the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LED Test | 01/01/70 00:00 |