| ??? 03/28/08 00:32 Read: times |
#152637 - Hey function lovers....how would you handle this? |
I have an interesting task in which the following is happening:
Using the ADC from 00-FF monitoring a pot. As a result of its location in the range, I have to adjust 4 seperate sliding scaling values within a limit range. L-0 are just the unsigned char place holders which are being pulled and saved to the eeprom seperate locations L: Limits 10-35 M: Limits 30-45 N: Limits 60-80 0: Limits 25-40 By default, on startup, each one will be stored in the EEprom and will have the initial value of whatever the middle of each range is. It should correlate as 80 on the pot will yield middle of each range. If the pot hits 00 then each will be at its defined lower limits, and conversely if FF at the upper limits as defined. Since each one has a different range and scale, simple incrementation will not work through each loop iteration. I would like to "gang" them together as a singular function. I can try to weight them, but it becomes cumbersome, I kind of know the direction I want to go with it, but would like an alternate opinions one the most efficient approach. Any thoughts....? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Hey function lovers....how would you handle this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Scale and offset? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| kinda.....but dependant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm not sure of what you want.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah....clarity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nitpicking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but whats a .1 among friends? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overlap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The overlap is proper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: not sure why one would do that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in the example give | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now I understand! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wow Russ....very nice piece of code there | 01/01/70 00:00 |