| ??? 03/28/08 00:57 Read: times |
#152640 - kinda.....but dependant Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Definetely scale and offset, but since some of the ranges are "smaller" than other, the ganged movement of all four as a function of ADC == 00 <> FF becomes the issue. I thought of the function mode you listed, but it would have to linearly change as a ratio of the input pots value......maybe I'm just missing it? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Hey function lovers....how would you handle this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Scale and offset? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| kinda.....but dependant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm not sure of what you want.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah....clarity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nitpicking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but whats a .1 among friends? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overlap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The overlap is proper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: not sure why one would do that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in the example give | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now I understand! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wow Russ....very nice piece of code there | 01/01/70 00:00 |