Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/21/08 01:18
Read: times


 
#154993 - Excuse me! But I dont agree
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Think in the possibility of the uC receive the MIDI_NOTE_ON twice, without the data bytes, because of some problem in the transmiter equipment or cables, etc, it can became asyncronized, rigth?
My code checks for MIDI_NOTE_ON, if its not, then verifies the state (in your code).

My code is working well, the problem was the 8052, for some reason it is not addressing for ram bytes higher than 127, strange, not?

Can I, how can I do something like this, a string o CJNE

CJNE A, #0, $+?
LJMP Somewhere

CJNE A, #1, $+?
LJMP Somewhere2

CJNE A, #2, $+?
LJMP Somewhere

...


Thanks!

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Indirect addressing trouble (with midi)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not sure I understand            01/01/70 00:00      
      Midi            01/01/70 00:00      
         CJNE            01/01/70 00:00      
            90H is Midi Note ON command            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, appears bad            01/01/70 00:00      
   Very Strange!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not strange            01/01/70 00:00      
         But is indirect address!?            01/01/70 00:00      
            You are right            01/01/70 00:00      
      It seems that 8052 is bad!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Some suggestions            01/01/70 00:00      
      Excuse me! But I dont agree            01/01/70 00:00      
         Don't blame the processor!            01/01/70 00:00      
            From time to time it happens...            01/01/70 00:00      
   check value of r0            01/01/70 00:00      
   Problem Solved!            01/01/70 00:00      
      full 'name' please            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List