| ??? 06/27/08 17:59 Read: times |
#156272 - the most likel7y reason is that Responding to: ???'s previous message |
still clue less about why it didnt worked at customer place.
the most likely reason is that some variables are declared at absolute locations. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Strange problem with Keil Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Probably not the volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who can know what is in the mind of the compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cut out the optimizer (set to 2) and see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembler Dump | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XRAM is enabled | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the most likel7y reason is that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You may want to let the linker know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| he is using a '124 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OVERLAYABLE ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh, no debugger for silabs chip? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I am using CA51 which dont have debugging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it will | 01/01/70 00:00 |