| ??? 07/22/08 06:28 Read: times |
#156927 - To Answer Your Question ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
(Aside from the EEPROM wear issue) your logic looks correct to me.
-- Russ  |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| incrementing a large number in assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wear and tear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The EEPROM is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| F-RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| F-RAM problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| found a substitute | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| first do it in C, then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Load/Save in loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Answer Your Question ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Russ - slow event | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A sample code for your task | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample code irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Socketed EEPROM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| walking writes are dead simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Larger EEPROM = simple code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the counter is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Blinkers | 01/01/70 00:00 |