??? 08/08/08 14:49 Modified: 08/08/08 15:24 Read: times |
#157332 - the fact is .. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the fact is that with a carefully crafted workloop you can do a lot of "multitasking things" without the call tree getting its knickers in a knot. This eliminates the use of "stack saves" and all the othere OS thingies that makes the chip/C 'uncomfortable'
solely speaking of using the '51 My absolutely preferred method is to use a processor that is fast enough that every 'task' is executed in a timely fashion without any prioritizing. My second choice is the one I mentioned in http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=157305 If both the above fails (as often happened in the days of the old 'steam driven' 8 MHz 12 clockers, when, in addition to using slowpokes, we used the '51 for 'strange things' for reasons of economy) I resort to things like what was discussed in the last few posts. Erik |