| ??? 08/13/08 06:53 Read: times |
#157450 - Why not CDB format Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hello
Think about who is the target group of your product. If it's a free compiler, as the SDCC 8051 compiler is, why not use the same debug format then? The desciption can be found on the SDCC home page. Best regards Juergen |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Extended OMF-51 specification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OMF-51 object file import/export | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not CDB format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or any standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use it in the debugger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the question is then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC supports part of extended | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is that true? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's what I thought! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What features are you missing in "orig" OMF51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 |