| ??? 08/13/08 08:38 Read: times |
#157455 - Or any standard Responding to: ???'s previous message |
From the user's point of view, I can't imagine what I would do with a proprietry, undocumented file format. I'd stick with something standard. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Extended OMF-51 specification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OMF-51 object file import/export | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not CDB format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or any standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use it in the debugger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the question is then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC supports part of extended | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is that true? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's what I thought! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What features are you missing in "orig" OMF51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 |