| ??? 08/29/08 08:58 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#157845 - Multiple implementations Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The availability of multiple C compilers is the big reason for not looking further than C. It would not be funny to develop in Pascal or any other language and later find out a fatal bug and that the single language implementation is no longer maintained.
With assembler and C, you always have a choice. It may take a but if adjustment to port from one assembler to another or from one C compiler to another but that time is minimal compared to having to port from one language to another after getting stuck. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Assembly vs C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tools for the Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other languages for the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C/C++ almost dead for PCs? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| .NET does not preclude C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C# or C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes especially for systems programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multiple implementations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C = RAD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rapid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I disagree here. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this again depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you said it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ain't this the truth! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Often even worse | 01/01/70 00:00 |