| ??? 08/29/08 14:20 Read: times |
#157861 - Often even worse Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No, this is the good case: They accept the unit to fulfill the requirements and then change the requirements. That makes it easy to invoice the delivery and then charge for the extras.
The biggest problem is when you deliver a prototype that fulfills the requirements but the customer realizes that they requested the wrong thing but don't dare to admit that to their bosses. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Assembly vs C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tools for the Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other languages for the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C/C++ almost dead for PCs? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| .NET does not preclude C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C# or C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes especially for systems programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multiple implementations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C = RAD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rapid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I disagree here. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this again depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you said it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ain't this the truth! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Often even worse | 01/01/70 00:00 |