| ??? 09/06/08 16:55 Read: times |
#158012 - still impossible Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Westermark said:
Of course it isn't impossible. Please read the question carefully. He want a delay without timer in background and this was impossible. You can implement a delay function for background tasks, but then it must use a timer. No way to do it with counting loops. This approach can only waste foreground time (real CPU time). Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| replacing timer by delay loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never just C. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The reason why you must not use C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Possible but costly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not black-or-white | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still impossible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still not impossible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hai Per westermark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| School work? | 01/01/70 00:00 |