Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/08/08 13:05
Read: times


 
#158062 - Possible but costly
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Yes, every single recompilation may require the delay (depending on compiler and architecture) to be revalidated. C51 processors are extra affected because of the static call-tree analysis often performed. That is why C-only loops are possible, but should be seen as a last desperate resort when no other choices are available. They are so darn error-prone and in the long run very, very costly. Besides the cost of the constant validations, you also have to factor in the potential for a recall.

That the OP still requests source code for both a C-only and a timer-based delay can be seen as an indication that the posts have not been fully read/understood, or that this may be a school assignment requiring multiple solutions to be submitted.

List of 10 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
replacing timer by delay loop            01/01/70 00:00      
   Never just C.            01/01/70 00:00      
      The reason why you must not use C            01/01/70 00:00      
         Possible but costly            01/01/70 00:00      
   Re            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not black-or-white            01/01/70 00:00      
         still impossible            01/01/70 00:00      
            Still not impossible            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hai Per westermark            01/01/70 00:00      
                  School work?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List