| ??? 09/21/08 20:56 Read: times |
#158489 - Well yes actually - now that you mention it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Didn't even cross my mind, but of course it should be in code.
Thanks Regards Marshall |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Location of Pointers in XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What does datasheet says? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC-51 ref manual, pg 51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ahh so easy when you read the instructions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| xdata? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| too? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well yes actually - now that you mention it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what do you really want? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are correct you supplied the answer as asked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wronk 'keyword' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| const + code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the compiler is smart enough to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It didn't actually compile with CONST | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const is expected to catch non-const assigns | 01/01/70 00:00 |