| ??? 09/22/08 12:51 Read: times |
#158506 - the compiler is smart enough to ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... know that code is const as well.
while it is not wrong to use 'const code' albeit const being superfluous, "adding in the CONST keyword" will not make it 'code' Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Location of Pointers in XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What does datasheet says? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC-51 ref manual, pg 51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ahh so easy when you read the instructions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| xdata? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| too? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well yes actually - now that you mention it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what do you really want? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are correct you supplied the answer as asked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wronk 'keyword' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| const + code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the compiler is smart enough to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It didn't actually compile with CONST | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const is expected to catch non-const assigns | 01/01/70 00:00 |