| ??? 09/23/08 09:49 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Question |
#158540 - What code? What tests? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You have not responded to comments about problems in your code.
Either you post an answer where you say why the comments are not relevant, or where you actually do fullfill the requirements. Or you post new code that incorporates the required changes. Having people reading the original code if problems have already been pointed out is meaningless. Another thing: Where is your post where you describe the test results for intermediate tests? Where is the test writing four bytes one at a time (value 1,2,3,4), and then performing a four-byte read - using the same address that you failed to use for a float?` Where is the test where you try to do a four-byte write, and then try to read back as four one-byte reads? A forum can help - but leaves the main responsibility on you. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| problem in FLOAT values in AT24C512 EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So how do you know it's the EEPROM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| serial EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read CODE ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why do you think it IS the code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What are the possibilities? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other possibilities | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reads clock 9 bits too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Also seeming to be missing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Sequential reads, the eeprom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Acknowledge bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are right Henry. It should be 'bit'. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code is given ... plz read ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But, Arvind, you DON'T send the ACK after reading! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What code? What tests? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try to read your name | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| commented code ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where is your 9th clock in Read... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dan Henry has already found the mistake! | 01/01/70 00:00 |