| ??? 10/09/08 16:04 Read: times |
#158941 - Now that is worrying.. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Based on your recommendation and the general opinions earlier, I have decided to do away with the input buffer amplifier.
On the aspect of rail-to-rail Op-Amps, I do wish I could lay my hands on one in my place. Dealers here stock run of the mill components only and the only other option is to knock at RS Components. Maybe I will do that finally. PS. Their is more wrong than the polarity with your drawn output buffers... It worries me a lot to read the above. Could you eloborate please ? Thanks Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Analog input signal conditioning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| voltage follower | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good link that.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wont work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It should have been +/- 15V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Excel automates resistor calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would eventually omit the input buffers... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now that is worrying.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I meant... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inputs swapped | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Extremely sorry for the goof up. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some hints... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just in time... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As long as... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes I understand. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Active clamp... | 01/01/70 00:00 |