??? 01/10/09 03:31 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#161398 - Easier if 89c52 is used Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you upgrade to a 89C52, then you could use timer2 to get a test clk, avoiding additional external hardware. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Frequency (Event) Counter Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
less than 1% error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Error % is incremental. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
;STARTING BOTH THE TIMERS AT THE SAME TIME | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Less variations in TL0 but still error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not know, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CRO Frequency Measurement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better But Still An Issue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How stabile is your signal source? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very Good Point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Easier if 89c52 is used | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How stabile is your signal source? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NE555 is popular but not a precision device![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |