| ??? 02/05/09 11:34 Read: times |
#162099 - Still not known if single pulse or pulse train Responding to: ???'s previous message |
But the OP hasn't still mentioned if he needs pulse trains with that timing, or if it is enough to produce a 40ns pulse with a longer delay until the next pulse. If the 40ns pulse is generated externally, then any processor may be used to trig the generation of the pulse by issing a single raise or fall of a processor pin. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| what is the signal freuency on all ports of at89c52/51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| minimum pule is 1086 nanoseconds. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buzz! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 40ns is a very short time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need a faster MCU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the fastest '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 80ns ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry about that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still not known if single pulse or pulse train | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where there's a will ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timer or PCA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| repeat earlier question with clarity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing can't be discussed when C is involved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Supplementary question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
At first blush . . . | 01/01/70 00:00 |