Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/02/01 16:48
Read: times


 
#16238 - RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc
Many definitions exist and the borderline is extremely fuzzy. For instance the 80C86 is considered a uP and the 80c186 is considered a uC.

Here are some definitions I have heard, none are absolutely correct.
1) A microprocessor (such as x86) is supposed to be used in places (such as a PC) where it does various things, a microcontroller is supposed to be used for one thing (such as a scale, a power controller, an analytical instrument etc)
2) a uP has code in RAM, a uC has code in (E(E)P)ROM
3) a uP has no I/O on the chip save the bus, a uC does.
4) a uP has an instruction set optimized for arithmetic, a uC has an instruction set optimized for logic.

The real question is not uC vs uP but the right device for the job. E.g. the
'51 has a powerful bit handling instruction set, the x86 doee not but has a better multiply/divide.

There is no solid answer to your question, this is probably as good an answer as you will get.

Have fun, do not worry whether uP or uC.

Erik

List of 7 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
basic doubt on Up & Uc            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc..Cory            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List