| ??? 11/02/01 16:48 Read: times |
#16238 - RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc |
Many definitions exist and the borderline is extremely fuzzy. For instance the 80C86 is considered a uP and the 80c186 is considered a uC.
Here are some definitions I have heard, none are absolutely correct. 1) A microprocessor (such as x86) is supposed to be used in places (such as a PC) where it does various things, a microcontroller is supposed to be used for one thing (such as a scale, a power controller, an analytical instrument etc) 2) a uP has code in RAM, a uC has code in (E(E)P)ROM 3) a uP has no I/O on the chip save the bus, a uC does. 4) a uP has an instruction set optimized for arithmetic, a uC has an instruction set optimized for logic. The real question is not uC vs uP but the right device for the job. E.g. the '51 has a powerful bit handling instruction set, the x86 doee not but has a better multiply/divide. There is no solid answer to your question, this is probably as good an answer as you will get. Have fun, do not worry whether uP or uC. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| basic doubt on Up & Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: basic doubt on Up & Uc..Cory | 01/01/70 00:00 |



